Your language is revealing

| Linda Hutchinson

The meeting was in a community space, the topic was people and families in the local area who are known to many different organisations, the initiative was billed as ‘person focused’. Yet within minutes it was clear this was ‘service focused’. And it as not just the statutory sector giving this impression, it was community and voluntary sector people too.

I’ve become used to this strange juxtaposition. Despite genuinely wanting to be seen as person focused, people find they cannot change their language. It is hard to let go of the service speak and the familiar words that play well in our own organisations or professional group. We have learnt the words to use to gain qualifications, to succeed in a professional space, to meet expectations of our peers and seniors. So letting go of these is not easy.

A previous article looked at this, in the sense of the liminal space, the place between the professional world and the real life one. It made the point that it is not enough to translate professional language into simpler, easier to understand words. It is about finding the place between both.

Maybe it is also about finding the will to not want to proclaim your right to be in the professional space. Talking about delivering services, providing support, hard to reach, engagement, activation, enabling, giving information and a multitude of others gives a sense of ‘me powerful, you weak’. Opening up by using everyday words implies we are, well, just like you. It means exposing our own vulnerabilities, our own need for support now or in the future. It means saying we are all people with different experiences and perspectives and all are valid, mine do not trump yours.

Over 70 years ago, George Orwell wrote “if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought” (Politics and the English Language, 1946). He was writing about language used by politicians – something that feels very pertinent in present day. But in any situation, the point remains that language has an effect on our ability to think.

Being talked down to means you will feel subservient. Being unable to fathom out what the hell people are talking about as it is full of acronyms and jargon says loud and clear that I am not meant to be part of this conversation.

If we are genuine about wanting to coproduce and work with people and patients at the centre of our thinking, then we must show this by choosing our words carefully.

Photo by Alexandra

Share this article:

Similar articles

by Helen Sharp

Celebrating 7 Years: milestone moments and looking forward

2024 marks 7 years of Ideas Alliance. Over that time we’ve grown from a small story sharing platform to a social consultancy on a mission to make co-production and collaboration the norm across the country. Co-founder Helen Sharp starts our celebrations by looking back at how it all started and what's coming next.

Read article
by Mel Parks

Gloucestershire Creative Health Consortium: Collective Power Awards

Celebrating and learning more about one of the CHWA Awards joint winners: made up of Art Shape; Mindsong; The Music Works; Artlift and Artspace. They all work in partnership to provide high quality, personalised, inclusive and accessible creative health services for people experiencing psychological and/or physical challenges.

Read article
by Mel Parks

2.8 Million Minds: Collective Power Awards

This blog features the 2.8 Million Minds project. Between November 2021 and May 2022, over 120 people contributed to A Manifesto for 2.8 Million Minds, a youth-led, artist-centred, and Disability Justice-informed approach to how young Londoners want to use art to begin to radically reimagine mental health support, justice and pride.

Read article